Strewth. Now there's doom'n'gloom laid out for us.
My 20c worth, fwiw, is that born-again commies will never give up but, unhappily for them, the UN's days are numbered. Do-goodish organisations evolve and ultimately die in a certain progression. They start out full of hope with idealistic intentions and then, before too long, they find themselves infiltrated and taken-over by closet-commie, wannabee revolutionaries. At which point their support base evaporates. Hence we now hear demands everywhere for UNexit.
Covid, aka WuFlu, underlined just how fragile the world's alleged "globalised" economy really is - and how suicidal (for us) is the tidal wave of coloured invasion into White nations that's become the real reason for globalisation. That
is a conspiracy but it has energised a reaction against it, which is why we're seeing fragmentation of conglomerates like the EU, imho.
If the EU does break, can NATO survive? America seems to be losing interest and not before time: why pursue a thankless enmity against Russia when Europeans are not willing to pay for their own defence?
As for "climate change", sure, it's a mere tool employed by socialist campaigners to "cabin, crib and confine" us. However, their problem is same one faced by all prophets: errm, but needless to say, present company excepted, Den!
Their problem is, what happens when simple observation contradicts dire prediction? Now that it transpires the planet is not warming beyond normal margins, that seas are not turning acid, that polar bears are flourishing, the Great Barrier Reef is in rude good health and so on, climate doomsters have a credibility problem. A terminal one. Which is why they attack "vile skeptics", aka realists, so viciously: same as pigs, they know when their slops-trough is in danger.
'Nuff of all that, though. What are the real dangers inbound?
There are several but let's just take two.
In my book, #1 is China. Yeah, they're gonna blunder into war, alright. It's because of the problems they're having within their country. It's why they made Winnie President-for-Life with plenary powers. They, as in the leadership of the CCP, hope a dictator can hold the disintegrating wreck together. As we know, others have been down that path and it ended badly.
Question is, what will the China War look like and what will happen when China loses? It won't be pretty, that's certain.
Another flashpoint, #2 but again merely imho, is what happens if (when?) war breaks out within NATO? One is thinking of Greece and Turkey. Can the Turks call upon Iran for help? Because they better not look to Russia: the Bear has wanted the Bosporus for centuries and if NATO folds in turmoil, who's in the way? Uncle Sam? Not sure I'd count on that. Moreover, there are brother Slavs to protect, mozlems in SE Europe are "unfinished business" since the days of Prinz Eugen,
edle Ritter, and we know what happens when the stopper's out of the bottle in Europe. One should think long-term in these matters of blood, soil and ancient grievance.
Yeah, could turn seriously bloody. In fact, things could look a lot like the scenes Nostradamus describes for the eastern Med. So, there you go, Den: Prophecy? 🧙♂️
